Ending months of speculation about a change of guard, Vijay Bahuguna on Friday resigned as Uttarakhand Chief Minister amidst indications that Union Minister Harish Rawat has emerged as a strong contender to succeed him.

Shortly before going to the Raj Bhawan to submit his resignation to Governor Aziz Qureshi, the former High Court judge-turned-politician said he was resigning on the directives of the party high command.

Union Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad and AICC General Secretaries Janardan Dwivedi and Ambika Soni, who is in charge of party affairs in the State, will be here on Saturday as Central observers for ensuring a smooth changeover.

Speculation was rife for months over Mr. Bahuguna’s ouster after his leadership skills come under scrutiny in the wake of a natural calamity of catastrophic proportions that had hit the state in June last year claiming thousands of lives.

Mr. Bahuguna’s alleged delayed response with rescue operations being launched about four to five days after the calamity struck on June 16-17 came in for bitter criticism, prompting the party high command to look for a substitute for him.

RITES Ltd., a premier consultancy organization proposes to recruit suitable technical personnel for the various positions. The appointment shall be purely on contract basis initially for a period of one year, extendable until completion of the assignment subject to mutual consent and satisfactory performance. Reservations for SC, ST and OBC would be as per extant Government orders. Candidates who are eligible can apply in prescribed format which is given in advertisement. for more detail please click at link of advertisement details.

Advertisement details

Schedule of Selection: 22nd February, 1st March & 8th March, 2014.

    Registration will be from 09.30 to 13.00 hrs. on the same day. 

The Staff Selection Commission conducted examination for recruitment of Constable (GD) in CAPFs and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles during the year 2012 of those candidates who had qualified the PST/PET. Appeared Candidates can check their Result at below links:

Click here for Result (Male)

Click here for Result (Female)

Click here for Write-up

Application are invited from Law Graduates for the appointment/assignment of the Law Assistants in the High Court of judicature at Patna on consolidated honorarium of Rs. 4000 per Month (under recommendations to be enhanced Rs. 10,000 per month) for a period of one year under Terms and Conditions which are given in advertisement. for advertisement click at below link

Advertisement details

Last date for Apply: 15th February, 2014.

Reference Press Note issued on 28th January, 2014 regarding re-examination at identified centres. The list of examination centres where re-examination for CGL, 2013 will be held is as follows:
 Lucknow, Patna, Allahabad, Delhi, Jaipur, Shimla and Dehradun. Candidates who appeared from these Centres may please note

Please click Link

Swaraj Party
Even after teh withdrawal of the Non-cooperation Movement, the Congress remained committed to the Council boycott programme. However, there was a section of influential Congressmen like C.R. Das, Motilal Nehru, Vithalbhai Patel and Madan Mohan Malaviya which was keen on contesting elections under the Act of 1919. They wanted to carry the fight against the British right into the legislative councils. C.R.Das as president of the Gaya session of the Congress in 1922, when Gandhi was in jail, pleaded very strongly in favour of council entry. But a majority of the Congress delegates led by C. Rajagopalachari passed a resolution against council entry. Consequently, Das resigned the presidentship and formed the Swaraj Party within the Congress. But hte debate continued between "the changers" led by Das and "no-changers" led by Rajagopalachari.
                   Meanwhile, the Swaraj Party contested elections in November 1923 and was very successful. After his release from jail, Gandhi found himself in  a peculiar situation. He reached an understanding with the Swarajists on the condition the condition that elections will not be contested on the Congress tickets. At the same time, he asked the Congressmen to devote all their energies to mass contact through a four-fold constructive programme. This programme aimed at social reform, economic development, village reconstruction and communal harmony. The constructive work in villages also included anti-liquor campaign, social work among depressed classes and untouchables, relief work in emergencies like floods, promotion of Khadi and other cottage crafts and establishment of national schools.

Kakori Conspiracy Case
When Gandhi was busy with his rural constructive programme, the country witnessed the revival of revolutionary activities in Bengal and United Provinces. The result was the establishment of the Hindustan Republican Association at Kanpur in October 1924 under the inspiration of Chandrashekhar Azad. The aim of this association was to achieve independence through an armed struggle. It had its branches in Delhi, Punjab, Bihar, Madras, the United Provinces and several other places. Some of the other leading revolutionaries were Surya Sen, Bhupendranath Dutt, Hemchandra Kanungo, Tam Prasad Bismal, Ashfaqullah Khan, Rajendranath Lahri and Roshan Lal.
             The members of the Hindustan Republican Association even went to the extent of looting government money in order to carry on their revolutionary activities. On 9th August 1925, for instance, these revolutionaries under the leadership of Ramprasad Bismal successfully derailed a train near Kakori railway station (United Provinces ) and looted the government treasury it was carrying. This incident is known as the Kakori Conspiracy Case. It was as a result of this case that Ramprasad Bismal =, Rajendranath Lahri and Ashfaqullla Khan were sentenced to death. All of them embraced the death happily for the national cause. Roshan Lal went to the gallows with a copy of the Gita in his hands and Bande Mataram on his lips. The last words of Ramprasad Vismal were: "I wish the downfall of the British empire".

Simon Commission
There was a virtual lull in the country's politics after the death of C.R.Das . However, the appointment of the Indian Statutory Commission in November 1927 under the chairmanship of John Simon broke this lull. Its stated objective was to examine the working of the Government of India Act of 1919 and suggest further measures to improve the Indian administration. All the members of this Commission were Englishmen. This all-white Commission is also known as the 'Simon Commission'.
          The exclusion of the Indians from the membership of the Commission confirmed their doubt that the British Government was not interested in any substantial instalment of genuine constitutional reforms. They demanded that the Indian members in the British House of Commons like S.P.Sinha must be associated with the Commission. Their argument was that only the Indians knew the nature of their problem. But the British Government rejected the Indian demand. Instead, the Secretary of State for India, Lord Birkenhead, insulted the Indians. He said that the Indians were not competent to discuss constitutional issues or work out a constitutional framework acceptable to all sections of the society.

The Indian Response
The exclusion of Indians from the membership of the Commission and the Birekenhead's statement hurt badly the self-esteem of the Indian leadership. The result was that all the political parties and groups like the Congress, Jinnah's Muslim League, the Hindu Mahasabha and others declared that the Indians would not cooperate with the Simon Commission. They announced that they would oppose the Commission in all forms and at every stage. The Congress under the Presidentship of Dr. M. A. Ansari demanded complete independence in December 1927. However, the attitude of the Punjab Unionists led by Sikandar Hayat Khan, the Justice Party in the Madras Presidency and the Muslim League of Mohammad Shafi was somewhat different. Mohammad Shafi even decided to cooperate with the Commission. But it did not have any impact.
                   The Indians fully supported the boycott call and organised big protest all over India. When the Simon Commission reached Bombay on 3rd February 1928, the entire nation observed a hartal. The members of the Commission witnessed hartals and protest demonstrations on a large scale wherever they went. "Go back Simon " had become the watchword of the Indians everywhere.
                  The British Government adopted a policy of repression to crush the anti-Simon movement. Thousands of innocent and unarmed Indians were beaten by the police. The poice did not spare even the prominent nationalist leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Lala Lajpat Rai and Govind Ballabh Pant. They were mercilessly beaten. As a result, Lala Lajpat Rai died in Lahore and Govind Ballabh pant got crippled for life. Paying a glowing tribute to Lala Lajpat Rai, Gandhi said : "Men like Lalaji cannot die so long as the sun shines in the Indian sky".
                The British repression and death of Lala Lajpat Rai on 17th November 1928 did not demoralise the Indians. On the contrary, they decided to give a new orientation to the freedom struggle. Revolutionaries like Sardar Bhagat Singh and Rajaguru  even went to the extent of avenging the death of Lala Lajpat Rai and killed a British officer, John Saunders. Saunders was responsible for the lathi charge on the ailing Lala Lajpat Rai . Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Datta created an excitement in the country by throwing two bombs on the floor of the Central Assembly Hall in Delhi on 8th April 1929. The most important aspect as they wanted to remind the British authorities that the Indian youth will not allow them to sit in peace. The government filed a case against them. The case is known as the Lahore Conspiracy Case is also known for the hunger strike, which culminated into the death of Jatin Das on 13th September 1929 after 64 day-long fast. "Another name has been added to the long and splendid roll of Indian martyrs. Let us bow our heads and pray for strength to act to carry on the struggle, however long it may be and whatever consequences. till the victory is ours". This was what Jawaharlal Nehru said while commenting on the death of Jatin Das.

Nehru Committee Report
What the Indians did to oppose the Simon Commission and avenge the death of Lala Lajpat Rai was one of the two important aspects of the national movement after 1927. The other was their resolve to show that they knew how to work out a people centric and nation-oriented constitutional framework. And they did do that. They organised an All Party Conference, which took less than a year to come out with a remarkable constitutional document. Motilal Nehru was the chief draftsman of the report. Therefore, it is known as the Nehru Committee Report. It, among other things, provided for fundamental rights of the type we enjoy today. Besides, it demanded Dominion Status or self-rule of the kind as it existed in other British colonies like Canada and Australia. It also favoured adult franchise, independent judiciary and reorganization of provincial boundaries on a linguistic basis.

Parting of the Way
However, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, an important member of the All Party Conference, rejected the report. He did so on the ground that the report was silent on his demands. Thereafter, he joined the Mohammad Shafi group, which stood for two-nation theory . The Congress, the Hindu Mahasabha and other members of the All Party Conference regarded all the demands of Jinnah communal, divisive and harmful for the country.Some of the demands of Jinnah included one-third representation to the Muslims in the Central Assembly, representation to the Muslims in proportion to their population in Punjab and Bengal and creation of three new Muslim- majority provinces(Sind, Baluchistan and North-West Frontier Province). After December 1928, Jinnah adopted a course which was only to end in the partition of India and establishment of a separate Muslim state. In March 1929, he put forward his "Fourteen Points", known as "Jinnah Report". These reiterated the demands for new Muslim-majority provinces, full provincial autonomy and one-third representation to the Muslims at the Centre plus separate electorates for the Muslims. Aga Khan and Ali brothers gave their full support to Jinnah and promo-ted the politics of  separatism.

Dominion Status and Subhas Chandra Bose
Meanwhile, the Congress held its annual session at Calcutta in December 1928. It was presided over by Motilal Nehru. The Congress accepted the Nehru Committee Report and asked the British to accept it in full. The Congress also warned the English government that it will demand Purna Swaraj (complete independence ) in case of its Dominion Status plea was not accepted within one year. But the British Government did not pay any heed to the Congress Suggestion and warning. How ever, this was not unexpected.  Subhas Chandra Bose, who had opposed the Dominion Status goal in Calcutta and favoured independence, had already told the Congress that the British Government would not concede this demand without a struggle. In fact, he had moved and amendment for independence which had been defeated by a narrow margin.

Demand for Purna Swaraj
The failure of the British Government to give Dominion Status to India and several other developments in 1929 hardened the Congress attitude. Some of the most noteworthy developments were the arrest of Gandhi at Calcutta in March and labour unrest on a very large scale in places like Bombay, Calcutta and Jamshedpur. There were more than 200 strikes and lock-outs in that year involving no less than five lakh workers. Besides the Indians, especially the younger generation and leaders like Subhas Chandra Bose, Jawaharlal Nehru and Satyamurty had been demanding complete independence. It was under these circumstances that the Congress session was held at Lahore in December 1929. The session of the Congress was presided over by Jawaharlal Nehru.
                  The Congress under the Presidentship of Jawaharlal Nehru rejected the 1928 Dominion Status goal as a timid ideal. Instead, it demanded Purna swaraj. At mid-night on 31st December 1929, the national tri-colour was unfurled at the bank of river Ravi amidst the "Bande Mataram" and "Inquilab Zindabad" slogans. Besides, the nation was asked by the Congress to observe 26 January as Independence Day every year. Accordingly, on 26th January 1930, the whole country observed Independence Day with dedication and zeal. Ever since, 26th January has become a red-letter day for all of us.
                  The struggle for Purna Swaraj begun under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi. His methods were non-violent, noble and effective. He knew the kind of problems his countrymen had been facing under the British rule. The Indians were also convinced that he alone could lead them aright and achieve freedom for India from the oppressive foreign rule.

Civil Disobedience Movement
The Civil Disobedience Movement started by the Congress under the leadership of Gandhi to achieve Purna Swaraj was different from the Non-cooperation Movement. Its goal and methods to achieve it were different. The goal this time was complete independence. It was to be achieved by breaking the law. Land revenue was also not to be paid to the government. Foreign goods too were to be boycotted. The freedom loving Indians were also to organize big protest, demonstrations or satyagrahas all over the country peacefully to show their resolve. In other words, the methods required the Indians to defy the government at all levels and make its functioning difficult and impossible.

The Dandi March
The Civil Disobedience Movement was actually started on 12th March 1930. It was on this day that Gandhi and 78 ashram members, including Sarojini Naidu, left Sabarmati in Ahmedabad for Dandi, a village on the Gujarat sea-coast to break the salt laws. This March is popularly known as 'Dandi March'. Gandhi and thousands of Indians, who had joined him during the course of the march, reached the sea on 6th April, Gandhi broke the salt laws the same day by making some salt from sea water. It was an illegal action. Making of salt was the government monopoly. Breaking the Salt Laws, Gandhi said :  "Our cause is strong, our means the purest and God is with us. There is no defeat for Satyagrahis till they give up the truth".
                     The breaking of salt laws by Gandhi was followed by similar actions in differnt parts of India, where salt was being made. Salt Satyagraha became a very effective movement in the coastal areas of Cuttack, Puri and Balasore districts (Orissa). C. Rajagopalachari organized a march just like the Dandi March from Trichy to Vedaranyam on Tanjore Coast to break the salt laws. similar marches were organised in Guntur district by Konda  Venkatapayya. In Malabar, such marches were organised by Kelappan, a Congress leader. All this changed the political atmosphere in India and the government got frightened.

People's Participation
The people, including women and teenagers, peasants and workers, the business community and the rich and the poor, all joined the movement. The participation of the tribals of the Central Provinces, Maharashtra, Bihar and Assam and of the hill people of Kangra in Punjab was equally significant. Largely attended protest demonstrations and complete hartals became order of the day. The Muslim League leaders and their followers did not take part in the movement.
                      The people did not pay taxes and land revenue to the government. There were several cases of public bonfire of foreign cloth and other goods. Thousands of women took part in picketing shops selling foreign cloth and liquor. Many of them also sold salt. The role played by such women organisations as Desh Sevika Sangh and Nari Satyagraha Samiti of Urmila Devi (Calcutta ) was very remarkable. People in different parts of India also clashed with the police. Some of these places were Calcutta, Madras and Karachi. The Pathan Muslims of North West Frontier Province (now in Pakistan) under Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, a disciple of Gandhi, Bengal revolutionaries under Surya Sen and the industrial workers in Sholapur made the things very difficult for the British. The role played by the Manipuri people in this regard was very significant Nagaland also produced a great heroine Rani Gaidilieu. She was just thirteen years of age when she joined the freedom struggle. The government arrested her in 1932 and sentenced her to life imprisonment . The people in South India, including Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra participated in the movement in a big way.

The British Reaction
The British adopted ruthless measures to crush the movement. The peaceful Satyagrahis, including women and teenagers, were badly beaten by the police. At several places, the police opened fire. Several Indians died. Over 90,000 Indians were arrested. In Delhi alone, over 1500 women were arrested. The British did not spare even great leaders like Khan abdul Gaffar Khan, Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Vallabhabhai Patel. Other leaders like Rajagopalachari, Abbas Tayabji, Madan Mohan Malaviya, K. M. Munshi, Mahadev Desai, J. M. Sengupta and Vithalbhai Patel, were arrested and put behind the bars. Gandhi too was arrestd on 5th May 1930. In Peshawar, the army platoons opened fire on peaceful Pathans, killing several of them. The Hindu soldiers of the Garhwal Rifles under Chander Singh Garhwali, who refused to open fire on the unarmed Pathans, were disarmed and imprisoned. The British even used aerial bombardment to crush the followers of Abdul Gaffar Khan. In May, the British imposed Martial Law on Sholapur. So much so, the British confiscated the agricultural land, household goods and cattle of the peasants when they refused to pay land revenue and other taxes. But the British Government failed to crush the freedom struggle.

Communalization through Constitutional Process
When the Indians were going to the jail and facing lathi blows and bullets, the British Government through of a constitutional process which was aimed at reducing the whole freedom struggle to the level of negotiations between different conflicting interests. In fact, the basic aim of the British was to politicise the struggle for Indian freedom  and treat the Congress as one of the several political parties and interests. It was in this background that the government convened a Round Table Conference in London in November 1930. It was to discuss the Indian issues and demands as well as the Simon Commission proposals. The Congress, which represented a vast majority of the Indian population, boycotted this Conference.

Gandhi-Irwin Pact
This British Government was fully aware that the Indians will accept only those reforms which were acceptable to the Congress. It also recognized that the Congress cooperation was necessary that the Congress cooperation was necessary to restore peace in India. Therefore, Lord Irwin, Governor-General of India, made serious efforts in early 1931 to ensure the Congress participation in the Second Round Table Conference. It was a strategic move to trap Gandhi and snatch from his hands the whole political initiative. As a result, Gandhi-Irwin Pact was signed. According to this Pact, the government was to release all the political prisoners who had not taken to violent methods during the Civil Disobedience Movement. This pact also required the Congress to suspend the Civil Disobedience Movement.
                      Consequently, the Congress agreed to take part in the Second Round Table Conference. It persuaded Mahatma Gandhi to go to London and participate in the Conference. It was a one-man delegation. This Conference, like the First Round Table Conference, ended in a deadlock. The main reason was the demand of the Muslims, the Anglo-Indians, the Europeans, the Indian Christians and the depressed castes in favour of separate  electorates. All these groups had come together in a 'minority pact' for joint action. Gandhi tried his best to persuade these groups not to make constitutional advance conditional on a solution to the communal problem, but did not succeed. Hence, Gandhi returned to India and revived the Civil Disobedience Movement. To crush the movement, the British Government again took recourse to very cruel methods.The police inflicted all kinds of cruelties on the Indians. The police repression was directed against all without any exception. The government arrested Gandhi and other popular leaders.

The Communal Award of 1932
On 16th August 1932, the British Prime Minister announced his Communal Award. It not only provided communal electorates for the Muslims and the Sikhs, but also for the members of the depressed communities Gandhi and the Congress condemned this Award as a sinister plan worked out to weaken the freedom struggle. He was of the view that the Communal Award was designed to destroy the Indian society and play the Hindus against the Muslims. Gandhi, who was in Yervada jail that time, started and indefinite fast on 20th September 1932, to force the British Prime Minister to withdraw that part of the part of the Award which was applicable to the depressed communities.
                      The action of Gandhi created a commotion throughout the country. The people got extremely worried for their great leader. Madan Mohan Malaviya and others approached B. R. Ambedkar, who happened to be a signatory to the 'minority pact', and asked him not to press his demand for separate electorates for the depressed communities. And, Ambedkar agreed . This led to the signing of the Poona Pact on 25th September 1932. It recommended joint electorates with reserved seats for the members of the depressed communities. The British accepted it and Gandhi broke his fast. In the meanwhile, the Third Round Table Conference was held in London in November 1932, but again with no concrete results. The Congress did not take part in the third and final Round Table Conference.

Indians : The Sole Factor
The Civil Disobedience Movement continued for some more time and was finally withdrawn in 1934. Though the Congress could not achieve the stated goal, it did succeed in arousing nationalism. In fact, it led to national upsurge all over the country. The same year the Congress adopted a significant resolution asking the British Government to set up a Constituent Assembly elected on an adult franchise. The resolution made it clear that the Indians alone had the right to decide the form of government under which they would like to shape their destiny.

Revolutionary Activities
The period of Civil Disobedience Movement witnessed several daring feats performed by the revolutionaries, including women revolutionaries, in different parts of India. They were restless to adopt a short-cut to freedom.They took to the path of armed struggle and many local groups emerged in United Provinces, Punjab and Bengal. Chandrashekhar Azad, along with other revolutionaries, made an attempt to blow up the special train of the Viceroy near Delhi, in December 1929 but failed. Ultimately, he sacrificed his life at the altar of the country on 27th February 1931. He was pierced with bullets in a park at Allahabad. The news of his martyrdom sent a shock wave throughout the country.
                  The revolutionaries led by Surya Sen thrilled the whole country on 18th April 1930  by raiding the port of Chittangong and seizing the local armoury. They raised the slogan of " Gandhiji's Raj has come" . Several revolutionaries, including brave women like Pritilata Wadedar and Kalpana Dutt, were with Surya Sen. However, the counter-attack by the British neutralised the Chittagong coup and resulted in the martyrdom of 12 revolutionaries on 22nd April 1930.
                 The Chittagong incident was followed by a series of attacks and murders of leading Englishmen in Bengal. The leading role in this regard was played by Binay Krishna Boose, Badal and Dinesh. On 8th December 1930, they raided the government headquarters in the Writers' Building, Calcutta and shot at Colonel Simpson. Convince that it was impossible to escape, Bose and Badal shot themselves dead. Dinesh did manage to escape. Ultimately, he too was apprehended and executed. The European Club in Chittagong was attacked with bomb and pistols on 22nd September 1932, by revolutionaries led by Pritilata Wadedar . During the attack, she got injured. Immediately thereafter, she killed herself to avoid arrest. Surya Sen, who was still at large, was finally arrested in February 1933 and hanged . In between, he had, in collaboration with his associates like Nirmal Sen and Apurba Sen, shot dead Captain Cameron.
                 The revolutionaries like Joti Jibon Ghose, Bimal Dasgupta, Pradyut Kumar Bhattachary  and Probhansu Pal killed several leading Englishmen. The school girls like Suniti Chowdhury and Santi Ghose also did not lag behind. They shot dead District Magistrate of Tripura, Stevens. Another valiant girl, Bina Das, made an abortive attempt on the life of he Bengal Governor, Stanley Jackson, in the Calcutta Univesity in 1932. All these activities, including the murder of the former Punjab Lt. Governor Sir Michael O'Dwyer by Udham Singh in London on 13th March 1940 alarmed the authorities. At the same time, these activities inspired many an Indian to lay down their lives for the cause of the country.
                  The period after 1930 also witnessed the growth of trade union and peasant activities. One of the major developments of the peasant activities was the formation of the first ever all India peasant organisation in 1936 under the persidentship of Swami Sahajanand Saraswati. It was called the All-India Kissan Sabha. Trade Unions too were established in different cities and towns.

The States People's Movements
You will be surprised to know that there were virtually two Indians during the period of your study. One was under the direct rule of the British. It was called British India. The other was ruled by the Indian princes and nawabs. It was known as princely states. There were about 560 big and small princely states. The British Government could interfere in the day-to-day working of these states. All these princes worked under the indirect control of their British masters and the English Political Residents. So much so, the British Government used them to weaken the democratic forces and freedom struggle that was going on in British India. There were many princes who willingly joined hands with the British in order to check the pro-independence and pro-democracy movements in British India. Their main aim was to protect and advance their own personal interests and rule over the people in despotic ways.
                   The social, economic and political life of the people in princely states was very miserable. It was even worse in many ways when we compare it with the one enjoyed by the people in British India. The people in most of the princely states did not have civil and democratic rights. They had no say in the political and economic matters. The press did not enjoy freedom. The people could not organise public meetings to discuss political and other issues concerning their well-being. Justice was denied to them. Educational facilities were available on a very limited scale. Jammu and Kashmir, Travancore, Baroda and Mysore were perhaps the only states where a few steps were taken by the princes to improve the social, economic and political life of the people. For example, the princes of these states used to spend substantial amount for the promotion of education among the masses. The system of administration of justice too was reorganised by them and the people were given the right to seek justice. The ruler of Jammu and Kashmir, Hari Singh, even passed a few Acts to improve the life and status of the peasantry and weaker sections. These Acts also laid down that no court shall discriminate between man and man on the ground of caste or creed.

Congress and Princely India
It is important to note that the Congress did not take any serious interest in princely states until 1938. Nor did it ever try to take up the problems being faced by the people residing there. It was only in 1938 that the Congress under Subhas Chandra Bose declared that it was fighting for the fighting for the independence of the entire country and not just British India. The Congress took another step in 1939, where Jawaharlal Nehru became the President of the All-India states People's Conference. He practically endorsed the Bose line. These steps thus brought princely states under the direct influence of the Congress. The result was that the pro-people movements already going on in different parts of princely states since 1920 gained more momentum and the freedom struggle became stronger.
               Some of the popular leaders and public-spirited persons, who had played and important role in princely states, were Sewa Singh (Punjab), Sarangadhar Das (Orissa), Balwant Rai Mehta and Vijay Jamnalal Bajaj (Gujrat) and Manikya Lal Verma and Vijay Singh Pathak (Rajasthan), and Ramananda Tirtha (Hyderabad). These and several others with mass appeal were responsible for the establishment of Praja Mandals and demanded civil liberties and responsible government in their states. The formation of the All-India States People's Conference in 1927 was also the result of their efforts. The chief objective of all these  organisations was to obtain for the people rule of law and democracy and integrate princely states fully with India. These movements led to political consciousness and created a new spirit of unity among the people of the states.

Constitutional Development
You have already read that the British Government had held three Round Table Conferences to break the political deadlock in India, but had failed. Thereafter, the British Prime Minister had announce certain proposals regarding the constitutional reforms in India.The Indians rejected all these proposals as anti-people and anti-democracy. On the contrary, the Indian leaders demanded the setting up of a Constituent Assembly elected on an adult franchise. They declared that they will accept only that constitution which was framed by the Indian Constituent Assembly.

The 1935 Act
However, the Indian political parties were not one as far as their views on the country's future structure of government were concerned.The Muslim  League wanted a weak Center and acceptance of its communal demands. The Congress stood for strong Centre and secular polity. The British Government exploited these contradictions in the political views of he Congress and the League. In March 1933, it issued a White paper containing certain proposals regarding the constitutional reforms in India. It also set up a joint Parliamentary Committee to go into the whole constitutional issue. This Committee was to suggest a reform scheme for India. But the scheme it recommended was worse. It was aimed at strengthening the British hold over India and denying the Indians their fundamental political and democratic rights.
                   Naturally, the Indian criticised the scheme as recommended by this Committee. They demanded a constitution that could empower them to shape and control fully their political and economic future. But the British Government did not care for the Indian sentiments. Instead, it passed and Act, called the Government of India Act of 1935. The Act came into force on 1st April 1937 and it was basically based on the schemes the Indian leadership had already rejected. This shows how indifferent the British Government was to the Indian needs.

False Claims
The British Government asserted that the 1935 Act was a great step forward as far as the empowerment of the Indians was concerned. For instance, it said that the Act provided for provincial autonomy and federalisation of the Indian polity. This was s false claim. The fact was that the 1935 Act, like the earlier Acts, invested the provincial governors with veto powers in sphers political and economic. They could override the majority or views of the elected assemblies and implement their own ideas aimed at promoting the British interests. On the contrary, the elected assemblies were unreal and ineffective for all practical purposes. They were so weak that they could not formulate policies according to the needs of the people. The ministers could give advice, but their views could be rejected. In addition, the governors could take over the administration of provinces under Section 93 of the 1935 Act.
                   Similarly, the scheme of federation as laid down by the Act was the negation of the very idea of federation . While the British India had no choice but to become part of the proposed federation, the princely states had the option to join or not to join it. Moreover, the whole scheme had been worked out to play the princes against the democratic forces in British India and harm the freedom struggle.
                    It was under these circumstances that the Congress and the League rejected outright the 1935 Act. Significantly, however, both the parties contested the 1937 elections to the provincial assemblies held under this Act. The Congress made it clear in the beginning that it was contesting elections not to seek power or office. It declared that its sole aim was to obtain a popular mandate against what Jawaharlal Nehru had described as "a charter of slavery". In other words, it stated that it will use the people's mandate to force the British Government to withdraw the 1935 Act. Further, the Federal part of the Constitution never came into effect as the princes did not join it.

Elections, Congress and The League
The Congress won an absolute majority in five of the eleven British Indian Provinces. In four provinces, it emerges as a single largest party. The performance of the Muslim League, which always claimed that it represented the will of the Indian Muslims, was extremely poor . It won only 109 of the 482 seats allotted to the Muslims. Its defeat in the Muslim-majority provinces like North-West Frontier Province,Sind, Bengal and Punjab was even more humiliating. These elections proved that a vast majority of the Muslims was opposed to the Muslim League. These also showed that in the Muslim-majority provinces leaders like Allah Bakash (Sind) , Sikandar Hayat KIhan (Punjab), Fazlul Haq(Bengal),Abdul Gaffar Khan (North-West Frontier province) Sadullah Khan(Assam were the actual Muslim leaders.
                       The Congress honoured its word given at the time of elections and refused to form ministries in the provinces. Later, however, it formed ministries in nine provinces. It did so after obtaining an assurance from the Governor-General of India that Provincial Governors will not interfere in the day-to-day administration. In Bengal and Punjab, non-Congress ministries functioned. The parties, which formed the governments in these provinces, were the Krishak Praja Party and the Unionist Party, respectively.
                       Though the Congress ministries failed to introduce radical changes, they did try to improve the life of the people. The Congress governments removed restrictions on the press and permitted peasant organisations and trade unions to function freely. In addition, they enacted agrarian legislation, undertook measures to uplift the depressed classes and promoted education. They also paid attention to village and modern industries.
                     It is important to note that the Muslim League did not like the formation of the Congress-led ministries. Its basic objection was that the Congress had ignored the Muslim League legislators while forming governments in the provinces. Jinnah found himself in wilderness. His League tried desperately to form a coalition ministry with the Congress in United Provinces. But the Congress conditions were not acceptable to it. This became a turning point for Jinnah, He entered into a secret correspondence with Sir Mohammad Iqbal, a poet, and decided to openly adopt the plank of Muslim separatism. Jinnah called the Muslim League session in 1937 at Lucknow, where he dubbed the Congress rule as the Hindu rule and denounced the Congress as a fascist party. He also dubbed Mahatma Gandhi as a Hindu revivalist. It was at this session that the Muslims were exhorted not to sing Bande Mataram.
                         True to his words Jinnah unleashed a vigrous propaganda against the Congress governments and levelled wild charges against them. The Muslim League also published a few documents containing details of atrocities allegedly committed by the Hindus on the Muslims and serious charges against the Congress governments. When leading Congress leaders like Subhas Chandra Bose and Dr. Rajendra Prasad challenged Jinnah and his Muslim League to prove their charges, they did not come forward. Instead, Jinnah declared that he was convinced that the Muslims could neither expect justice  nor fair play under the Hindu-dominated Congress governments. He also started preaching two-nation theory with renewed vigour. His whole objective was to inflame communal feelings among the Muslims and prepare the ground for separation.
                 

Staff Selection Commission conducted Combined Graduate Level Examination 2013 (Tier I) on April 21, 2013 and May 19, 2013. The Tier-II Exam was held on September 29, 2013. There have been reports of use of unfair means at a number of centres identified by investigation agency in Tier I and II. 

Keeping in view the sanctity of the Examination, interest of the candidates and the investigation report received from Delhi Police it has been decided by the Government to hold re-examination of Tier-I and II at identified centres from where reports of use of unfair means has been received. The list of these centres will be placed on the Commission’s website (www.ssc.nic.in) shortly. Age relaxation, where required would be permitted to appear for re-examination. 

Click here PIB

Staff Selection Commission has declared the result for combined recruitment of the post for assistant engineer in Prasar Bharti  exam 2013. All appeared candidates can check their result at following link

Click here for Result

Click here for Write up

Applications are invited from the eligible candidates for the post of Hindi Typists in pay scale of Rs. 5200-20200 with grade pay of Rs. 2400 by Jharkhand High Court. Candidates can submit application in prescribed format on or before 28th February,2014. for more details, please click at below advertisement link:

Advertisement details

Last date for submission of application: 28th February,2014.

Gujarat Panchayat Service Selection Board (GPSSB) is invited application for recruitment to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil). Eligible candidates can apply online on or before 5th February, 2014. for more details please click below:

Advertisement details

Last date for submission of application: 5th February, 2014.

Staff Selection Commission (SSC) has declared Paper II result for the recruitment to the post of Delhi Police,CAPFs, Assistant sub-inspector in CISF Examination-2013 which was conducted on 6th October, 2013 for candidates qualified in Paper I. The candidates who have qualified in paper II will call for Interview. All appeared candidates in paper II can check their Result at following link:

Click here for Result (Male)

Click here for Result (Female)

Click here for Write-up

Staff Selection Commission (SSC) has issued Answer Key of Stenographers (Grade C & D) Examination-2013 which was conducted on 29th December, 2013 across India at various centers by SSC. The candidates, who has appeared in exam, can check the answer key for estimation of marks. Discrepancies relating to question/incorrect keys,if any, should be brought into the notice of under secretary on or before 5th February,2014. for Answer key and Write up please click at below

Click here for Answer keys

Click here for Write-up

Last date for Representations: 5th February,2014

India ace shuttler Saina Nehwal today snapped her 15 months title drought, clinching the Syed Modi International India Grand Prix Gold badminton crown with a straight-game victory over compatriot P V Sindhu in the women’s singles competition, here today.

The London Olympics bronze medallist staved off the challenge from Sindhu 21—14, 21—17 in the women’s singles summit clash, which lasted 40 minutes at the Babu Banarasi Das Indoor Stadium here.

The two—time champion was tested by her younger colleague but Saina kept her nerve to eventually break a 15-month title drought after appearing in her 22nd final of her international career.

Sushil Koirala is set to become Nepal’s next Prime Minister after being elected on Sunday as the Parliamentary Party leader of the Nepali Congress, which emerged as the single largest party in the Constituent Assembly elections.

The 74-year-old Nepali Congress president defeated his rival senior party leader and three-time Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba by 16 votes in the Parliamentary Party election.

Of the total 194 valid votes, Mr. Koirala secured 105 votes while Mr. Deuba got 89 votes.

Nepali Congress is the largest party in the 601-seat Constituent Assembly after it secured 196 seats in the November 19 polls.

Mr. Koirala, being the Parliamentary Party leader of the Nepali Congress, the largest party in the Constituent Assembly, is most likely to be the next Prime Minister of Nepal.

Nepali Congress, however, needs support from either CPN-UML or Unified CPN-Maoist and other fringe parties to reach the magical number of 301 seats in the Constituent Assembly to form the government.

Negotiations have begun on power sharing and distributing key posts among Nepali Congress, and UCPN-Maoist and CPN-UML leaders.

Parliamentary party leader will be the legitimate candidate to become the Prime Minister.

Stanislas Wawrinka held off an injured Rafael Nadal to win his first Grand Slam title with a 6—3, 6—2, 3—6, 6—3 victory on Sunday in the Australian Open final.

The 28-year-old Swiss player had never taken a set off Nadal in 12 previous meetings, but dominated from the start at Melbourne Park.

Nadal appeared to be on the verge of retiring in the second set, when he hurt his back and needed a medical time out.

Nadal has had a terrible stretch with injuries at the Australian Open, and has described it as his unluckiest Grand Slam. He missed the 2013 edition during a seven-month layoff with knee injuries and illness, and his quarterfinal losses in 2010 and 2011 were affected by injuries.

Colourful images of India’s cultural heritage, manoeuvres by fighter aircraft,  military prowess and march past by armed forces were on majestic display at Rajpath on Sunday as the nation celebrated its 65th Republic Day amid tight security.

Marching down from the seat of power at Raisina Hills to Red Fort, the parade showcased India’s ‘unity in diversity’ and defence capability

Following is the list of the 127 awardees of Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan and Padma Shri which were announced on the eve of the 65th Republic day.

Padma Vibhushan

Dr Raghunath A Mashelkar, Science and Engineering, Maharashtra

B K S Iyengar, Yoga, Maharashtra

Padma Bhushan

Gulam Mohammed Sheikh, Art-Painting, Gujarat

Begum Parveen Sultana, Art-Classical Singing, Maharashtra

T H Vinayakram, Art-Ghatam Artist, Tamil Nadu

Kamala Haasan, Art-Cinema, Tamil Nadu

Justice Dalveer Bhandari, Public Affairs, Delhi

Prof Padmanabhan Balaram, Science and Engineering, Karnataka

Prof Jyeshtharaj Joshi, Science and Engineering, Maharashtra

Dr Madappa Mahadevappa, Science and Engineering, Karnataka

Dr Thirumalachari Ramasami, Science and Engineering, Delhi

Dr Vinod Prakash Sharma, Science and Engineering, Delhi

Dr Radhakrishnan Koppillil, Science and Engineering, Karnataka

Dr Mrityunjay Athreya, Literature and Education, Delhi

Anita Desai, Literature and Education, Delhi

Dr Dhirubhai Thaker, Literature and Education, Gujarat

Vairamuthu Ramasamy Thevar, Literature and Education, Tamil Nadu

Ruskin Bond, Literature and Education, Uttarakhand

Pullela Gopichand, Sports-Badminton, Andhra Pradesh

Leander Paes, Sports-Tennis, Maharashtra

Vijayendra Nath Kaul, Civil Service, Delhi

Late Justice Jagdish Sharan Verma, Public Affairs, Uttar Pradesh

Late Dr Anumolu Ramakrishna, Science and Engineering, Andhra Pradesh

Prof Anisuzzaman, Literature and Education, Bangladesh

Prof Lloyd I Rudolph, Literature and Education, USA

Prof Susanne H Rudolph, Literature and Education, USA

Dr (Smt) Neelam Kler, Medicine- Neonatology, Delhi

Padma Shri

Mohammad Ali Baig,    Art-Theatre, Andhra Pradesh

Nayana Apte Joshi, Art, Maharashtra

Musafir Ram Bhardwaj, Art-Instrumental Music- Pauna Manjha, Himachal Pradesh

Sabitri Chatterjee, Art-Film, West Bengal

Prof Biman Bihari Das, Art-Sculptor, Delhi

Sunil Das, Art-Painting, West Bengal

Elam Endira Devi, Art-Manipuri Dance, Manipur

Vijay Ghate, Art-Instrumental Music- Tabla, Maharashtra

Rani Karnaa, Art-Kathak, West Bengal

Bansi Kaul, Art-Theatre, Jammu and Kashmir

Ustad Moinuddin Khan, Art-Instrumental Music-Sarangi Player, Rajasthan

Geeta Mahalik, Art-Odishi Dance, Delhi

Paresh Maity, Art-Painting, Delhi

Ram Mohan, Art-Film Animation, Maharashtra

Sudarsan Pattnaik, Art-Sand artist, Odisha

Paresh Rawal, Art-Cinema and Theatre, Maharashtra

Wendell Augustine Rodricks, Art-Fashion Designing, Goa

Prof Kalamandalam Sathyabhama, Art-Mohini Attam, Kerala

Shri Anuj (Ramanuj) Sharma, Art-Performing Art, Chhattisgarh

Santosh Sivan, Art- Film, Tamil Nadu

Supriya Dev, Art-Bengali Cinema, West Bengal

Sooni Taraporevala, Art- Script Writing, Maharashtra

Vidya Balan, Art-Cinema, Maharashtra

Durga Jain, Social Work, Maharashtra

Dr Rama Rao Anumolu, Social Work, Andhra Pradesh

Dr Brahm Dutt, Social Work, Haryana

Mukul Chandra Goswami, Social Work, Assam

J L Kaul, Social Work, Delhi

Mathurbhai Madhabhai Savani, Social Work, Gujarat

Tashi Tondup, Public Affairs, Jammu and Kashmir

Dr Hasmukh Chamanlal Shah, Public Affairs, Gujarat

Sekhar Basu, Science and Engineering, Maharashtra

Madhavan Chandradathan, Science and Engineering, Kerala.

Sushanta Kumar Dattagupta, Science and Engineering, West Bengal

Dr Ravi Bhushan Grover, Science and Engineering, Maharashtra

Prof Eluvathingal Devassy Jemmis, Science and Engineering, Karnataka

Ramkrishna V HosuR, Science and Engineering, Maharashtra

Dr Ajay Kumar Parida, Science and Engineering, Tamil Nadu

Dr Malapaka Yajneswara Satyanarayana Prasad, Science and Engineering, Andhra Pradesh

Kiran Kumar Alur Seelin, Science and Engineering, Gujarat

Dr Brahma Singh, Science and Engineering, Delhi

Prof Vinod Kumar Singh, Science and Engineering, Madhya Pradesh

Dr Govindan Sundararajan, Science and Engineering, Andhra Pradesh

Ramaswamy R Iyer, Science and Engineering, Delhi

Dr Jayanta Kumar Ghosh, Science and Engineering, West Bengal

Ravi Kumar NarrA, Trade and Industry, Andhra Pradesh

Rajesh Saraiya, Trade and Industry, Maharashtra

Mallika Srinivasan, Trade and Industry, Tamil Nadu

Pratap Govindrao Pawar, Trade and Industry, Maharashtra

Dr Kiritkumar Mansukhlal Acharya, Medicine- Dermatology, Gujarat

Dr Balram Bhargava, Medicine- Cardiology, Uttar Pradesh

Prof (Dr) Indra Chakravarty, Medicine- Health and Hygiene, West Bengal

Dr Ramakant Krishnaji Deshpande, Medicine- Oncology, Maharashtra

Prof (Dr) Pawan Raj Goyal, Medicine- Chest Disease, Haryana

Prof Amod Gupta, Medicine- Opthalmology, Haryana

Prof (Dr) Daya Kishore Hazra, Medicine, Uttar Pradesh

Prof (Dr) Thenumgal Poulose Jacob, Medicine- Vascular Surgery, Tamil Nadu

Prof (Dr) Shashank R Joshi, Medicine- Endocrinology, Maharashtra

Prof Hakim Syed Khaleefathullah, Medicine- Unani Medicine, Tamil Nadu

Dr Milind Vasant Kirtane, Medicine- ENT Surgery, Maharashtra

Dr Lalit Kumar, Medicine- Oncology, Delhi

Dr Mohan Mishra, Medicine, Bihar

Dr M Subhadra Nair, Medicine- Gyneacology, Kerala

Dr Ashok Panagariya, Medicine- Neurology, Rajasthan

Dr Narendra Kumar Pandey, Medicine- Surgery, Haryana

Dr Sunil Pradhan, Medicine- Neurology, Uttar Pradesh

Dr Ashok Rajgopal, Medicine- Orthopaedics, Delhi

Dr Kamini A Rao, Medicine- Reproductive Medicine, Karnataka

Dr Sarbeswar Sahariah,

Medicine- Surgery, Andhra Pradesh

Prof Om Prakash Upadhyaya, Medicine, Punjab

Prof (Dr) Mahesh Verma, Medicine- Dental Science, Delhi

Dr J S Titiyal, Medicine-Opthalmology, Delhi

Dr Nitish Naik, Medicine- Cardiology, Delhi

Dr Surbrat Kumar Acharya, Medicine-Gastroentrology, Delhi

Dr Rajesh Kumar Grover, Medicine-Oncology, Delhi

Dr Naheed Abidi, Literature and Education, Uttar Pradesh

Prof Ashok Chakradhar, Literature and Education, Delhi

Chhakchhuak Chhuanvawra, Literature and Education, Mizoram

Keki N Daruwalla, Literature and Education, Delhi

Prof Ganesh Narayandas Devi, Literature and Education, Gujarat

Prof Kolakaluri Enoch, Literature and Education, Andhra Pradesh

Prof (Dr) Ved Kumari Ghai, Literature and Education, Jammu and Kashmir

Smt Manorama Jafa, Literature and Education, Delhi

Prof Rehana Khatoon, Literature and Education, Delhi

Dr Waikhom Gojen Meeitei, Literature and Education, Manipur

Vishnu Narayanan Namboothiri, Literature and Education, Kerala

Prof Dinesh Singh, Literature and Education, Delhi

Dr (Mrs) P Kilemsungla, Literature and Education, Nagaland

Anjum Chopra, Sports- Cricket, Delhi

Sunil Dabas, Sports- Kabbadi, Haryana

Love Raj Singh Dharmshaktu, Sports- Mountaineering, Delhi

Dipika Rebecca Pallikal, Sports- Squash, Tamil Nadu

H Boniface Prabhu, Sports- Wheelchair Tennis, Karnataka

Yuvraj Singh, Sports- Cricket, Haryana

Mamta Sodha, Sports- Mountaineering, Haryana

Parveen Talha, Civil Service, Uttar Pradesh

Late Dr Narendra Achyut Dabholkar, Social Work Maharashtra

Ashok Kumar Mago, Trade and Industry, USA

Siddharth Mukherjee, Medicine-Oncology, USA

Dr Vamsi Mootha, Medicine- Biomedical Research, USA

Dr Sengaku Mayeda, Literature and Education, Japan.

Vasco-de-Gama was the first European navigator who reached India in 1498 . He had reached India with the help of an Indian. It was a revolutionary news for the whole of Europe It gave an opportunity to the Europeans like the Portuguese, the Dutch, the French and the British to exploit India. Soon India became a land of free looters.
However, it was the English East India Company which met with a success. All others struggled and fought with their British rivals to establish their foothold in India, but failed. They could not match the British diplomacy and treachery plus their firm determination. Queen Elizabeth of England had granted the privilege to the East India Company to carry on the trading activities in the East India Company  to carry on the trading activities in the East as early as on 31
December , 1600, The English Indian company for over 150 years remained a trading company . It took another 100 years to establish its away over a large part of India and rule over her directly or indirectly on behalf of the British Government . In 1858, the East India Company was deprived of its power and the Government of India was brought under the British Crown . It is interesting to note that the rise and growth of British rule in India coincided with the industrial revolution in Europe . The immediate result of the revolution was the emergence of machine civilisaton which required new markets and more raw materials.
IMPACT OF BRITISH RULE
The aim of the British policies was to consolidate and prolong their rule over India. These were also designed to enable the British to exploit, loot and plunder the Indians and their natural resources. Science and technology considerably helped them in their exploitative scheme. Consequently, the impact of the British rule in India was disastrous.
The revenue policy adopted by the British ruined the small farmers and many others dependent on agriculture. The administrators were mainly interested in heavy revenue collection. The ruthless collection of revenue in cash or kind left nothing with their farmers to sustain production and feed their own families. As a result, quite a large number of farmers deserted their villages. This development, in its turn, led to a steep fall in agricultural production and severe famines. It also resulted in the indebtedness of the farmers and poverty in the countryside.
The industrial policy of the British crippled the town handicrafts and the Indian cottage industries. It rendered millions of the Indian artisans and craftsmen jobless. For the British, Manchester, Lancashire and other fast growing industrial towns in England like Glasgow were important. The aim of the policy of taxation adopted by the British from time to time was not different. The imposition of heavy excise duty on the Indian-made goods and virtually no or a little import duty on the British-made goods were a device designed to ensure precendence of the English goods over the Indian goods. In certain cases, duties levied were as high as 400 percent. This policy harmed the interests of the Indian traders and industrialists. The principle of free trade also denied the Indian handicrafts any protection. With the result, the Indian exports fell rapidly. All this increased the miseries of the people of India. But the British Government did nothing to improve their condition. On the other hand, it compelled the already half-starved Indian to pay tax “ on the salt he eats, on the oil he burns, on the strip of cotton cloth which he ties round his loins” and drain their wealth.
The destruction of the country’s traditional economy was one side of the story of the British rule. The other was their policy of racial discrimination. Under this policy, the Indians holding similar positions and in the same departments were treated differently from their British counterparts in terms of wages, powers and status. The modern history is full of such examples which show how contemptuous the British rulers were towards the Indians. This also show that the higher positions in departments like defence, revenue and judicial were the sole preserve of the British. The Indians were considered fit only for petty jobs. The British used to call them “Niggers” .
The British Government worked out and implemented policies which divided the Indian society on caste and communal lines. The purpose behind these policies was to create conditions which could help the British to rule over India smoothly. Yet another purpose of the British was to prove that their culture was more superior, scientific and humane. It was also to convey the feeling that the Indian culture and religion were responsible for all the ills faced by the Indian society. Their whole intention was to create a sense of inferiority complex among the Indians and induce them to support the British in all matters. The British rule, in shout, ruined India politically, culturally and economically. Besides, it also created among the Indians a class of loyalists, first  in the shape of landlords and then the middle classes. All this made the Indians to seethe with anger.
There were several other factors which had also contributed considerably to the Indian unrest. These included indirect encouragement to Christian missionaries, promotion fo English education through the missionary institutions and displacement of Persian as the court and official language.  These had led to the passing of the Religious Disabilities Act ( 1851 ) , the Widow Remarriage Act (1856) and large scale unemployment among the Indians.
THE OTHER SIDE
The British took steps from time to time to protect and promote further their political and financial interests and endure safety of their empire in India. Some of these were, the introduction of railway and steamers, post and telegraph system and a uniform administrative system throughout India with some changes here and there. All these steps turned out to be a blessing in disguise for the Indians They enabled the more awakened Indians to understand the implications of the British policies and organize public opinion against them. These also enabled the public-spirited Indians to tour different parts of the country to see for themselves the plight of their countrymen and establish contact with them.
POPULAR REVOLTS
The British policies had offended all sections of Indian society. The Indian princes, who ruled over considerable part of the country, too were unhappy with the British. The British method of playing one prince against the other, Lord Wellesley’s policy of Subsidiary Alliances, Lord Dalhousie’s Doctrine of Lapse and similar other methods were aimed at annexing the princely dominions and enslaving the people. Lord Dalhousie, for example, annexed no less than eight states, including the last two independent states of Punjab (1849) and Awadh (1956), during his rule. He also refused to continue the pension to Nana Saheb, the adopted son of the ex-Peshwa Bajirao II , and denied Rani of Jhansi of her ruling rights. In fact, Lord Curzon and several other British administrators committed many provocative acts.
All these ended the patience of the Indians. Their discontent brust out in local popular revolts in different areas. The Bhils revolted against the British in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. In Bihar and Bengal, the Santhals raised a banner of revolt. The Khonds and the Gonds in Orissa were up in arms against the British. The British faced armed rebellions of the Kols in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. Similarly, the Mers in Rajasthan, the Kolis in Maharashtra and the Khasis in Meghalaya were in revolt against the British rule. The southern India also witnessed a number of anti-British uprisings(1795-1805). The most powerful uprising was by the Poligars or the zamindars with Marudu Pandyan as one of its great leaders.
The anger against the British rule was confined not just to the civil population. The sepoys or the Indian soldiers in the British Army too had their complaints against the British. They raised a banner of revolt against the British a number of times. Some of the most significant sepoy mutinies were the ones which broke out at Vellore in South India in 1806 and Barrackpore near Calcutta (Kolkata) in 1824. The British Government suppressed all these revolts and mutinies with a heavy hand. In the process, hundreds of Indians, including soldiers, lost their lives. The extent of the British repression can be determined from the fact that more than 15000 rebels, including a number of leaders, were brutally murdered and executed during the famous Santhal tribaluprising of 1855-1856 alone.
UPRISING OF 1857
As described above, all sections of Indian society were feeling alienated from the British for manifold reasons and were keen to get rid of the British colonial domination. Their discontent against the British rule on all counts grew more and more with each passing day. Ultimately, it resulted in the great uprising of 1857. According to Nana Saheb Peshwa’s close associate Azimullah Khan, the setbacks suffered by the British forces in the earlier stages of the Crimean war had also encouraged the hope of rebellion in India. The upheaval of 1857 is described as the first war of Indian independence.
Recent researches have established that the 1857 rebellion was a well-planned affair. It had all India dimensions. Both the sepoys a well as civil popu;ation had been mobilized by the word of mouth and symblolic circulation of lotus flower and chapattis. A date coinciding with the hundredth anniversary of the battle of Plassey had been fixed for the simultaneous uprising all over India. Nana Saheb, son of last Peshwa Bajirao II, was the brain behind the whole plan.
IMMEDIATE CAUSE
The immediate cause was the supply of the greased cartridges to the Indian sepoys, both Hindu and Muslim. This action constituted a grave provocation and regarded by the Indians a great insult to their religions. Why did the Indian soldiers refuse to use the newly supplied cartridges? Because these were smeared with cows and pigs fat forbidden to the Hindus and Muslims, respectively. Their wrapper had to be removed with mouth before the newly introduced rifles could be loaded and used. This action on the part of the British authorities hurt the religious sentiments of the Hindus and the Muslims.
The troops at Dum Dum refused to use these cartridges on 23 January, 1857. On 29 March, Mangal Pandey, a sepoy at Barrackpore, injured an European officer. The british executed him and disarmed and transferred his Native infantry to Meerut. At Meerut, the sepoys, who refused to use these cartridges, were sentenced to ten years imprisonment. They were publicly disgraced and taunted on 9 May. And , on 10 May the three Indian regiments shot their officers and secured the release of the Indian sepoys by breaking open the prisons. Thereafter, they rebels proclaimed the last Mughal scion Bahadur Shah as the Emperor of India. Immediately thereafter, Bahadur Shah ordered a ban on cow slaughter.
Starting at Meerut, the uprising soon spread to many parts of the country. The major centres of the uprising were Awadh, Rohilkhand , Bundelkhand, Agra, Meerut, Allahabad and area around it and western Bihar. The uprising also engulfed areas in southern India. Aurangabad and Kolhapur were the most affected areas. The most prominent leaders of this uprising were Nana Saheb Peshwa, Azimullah Khan, Tantia Tope, Rani Lakshmi Bai of Jhansi, Kunwar Singh of Jagdishpur (Bihar), Prince Feroze Ahah, Maulvi Ahmadullah of Faizabad, Bakhat Khan and Nawab Khan Bahadur of Bareilly and Begum Hazrat Mahal of Lucknow.
COLLAPSE OF THE UPRISING
For a while the sudden outbreak at Meerut and capture of Delhi by the rebels caught the British by surprise. But soon they recovered and were able to recapture Delhi with the help of the newly raised forces in the Punjab. This was a big set back to the uprising. The british arrested, tried and deported Bahaduir Shah to Rangoon in Burma (Myanmar). In April 1858. Kunwar Singh died of a serious injury caused during his fierce struggle against the British. Two months later, the British captured Lucknow. Lakshmi Bai Rani of Jhansi fought a heroic battle with the British but luck did not favour her. She had to leave Jhansi. Thereafter, she captured Gwalior in collaboration with Tantia Tope and died in June 1858 an inspiring death fighting against the enemy forces. Tantia Tope himself, who offered a strong resistance to the British for two years both in Central India and Rajputana, fell into their hands through treachery and was hanged.Nana Saheb left India and went to Nepal. The British with the best of their efforts could not capture him. His disappearance has led to many romantic legends.
Several factors helped the British to suppress the upheaval. Some of them were the telegraph system and steamer service and diplomacy. While the telegraph system enabled them to receive timely information, the steamer service helped them in dispatching quickly arms and ammunition and troops to the trouble spots. Similarly, through their diplomacy they could enlist the support of Nepal, Patiala, Nabha and Jind as well as prime ministers, Dinkar rao of Gwalior and Salar Jung of Hyderabad against the rebels. In addition, the British exploited the differences among the Indians based on religions, caste and regional considerations. The end of the Crimean war, which had resulted in the defeat of Russia, had also enabled the British to with draw the English troops from Turkey and use their services in India. However, the most important factor which contributed considerably to the collapse of the upheaval was that it took place earlier than the fixed date(31 May 1857 ) . This premature outbreak had resulted in the lack of coordination among the leaders and forces fighting in different areas. On the other hand, it had forewarned the British rulers who could take precautionary measures in advance.
POLICY OF REPRESSION AND REWARD
After the suppression of the uprising, the British followed a policy of brutal repression and reward. Those who had fought against the British were subjected to inhuman cruelties. The common civilians, including the peasants, also became the target of the British wrath. The revengeful British mervelessly murdered, shot dead and executed hundreds of Indians and resorted to loot and arson in the recaptured and other towns. To instill terror among the people, the British hanged the bank or river Ganga from Benaras to Allahabad. In Awadh alone, over one lakh Indians, both Hindu and Muslim were killed. On the other hand, those who had helped the British were rewarded with sanads, titles, jagirs and similar other things.
But this was not all. In August 1858, the British Parliament passed an Act which ended the rule of the English East India Company and transferred the control of the British Government in India to the British Crown. Queen Victoria also issued a Proclamation the same year indicating the nature of policies to be pursued by the British Government in India. The British took several steps in order to strengthen their rule in India and create dissensions in the Indian society. The steps aimed at weakening the society included the disarming of the entire Indian population and reorganization of the army on caste, communal and regional lines. And, those designed to create a strong support base for the British included the preservation of princely states as breakwaters against the rising tide of any future rebellion and association of the loyal Indian elements with the legislature. They won over the loyalty of princes by discarding their age-old policy of annexation and associated the loyalist Indians with the legislature by enacting the Indian Councils Act  of 1861.
IMPORTANCE OF THE UPRISING
Though the uprising  collapsed, it did constitute a great landmark in the history of Indian freedom movement. It was the last organized effort of the old order based on organized armies and princes and its failure led to the completion of the process of political and military expansion started by the British at Plassey in 1757. At the same time, the uprising helped in achieving political unity between different regions against the foreign rule. It also set for the nation, numerous glorious heroic examples. The subjugated Indians were deeply moved and inspired by the supreme sacrifices made by Rani Lakshmi Bai. Tantia Tope and others.
SPIRIT OF RESISTANCE
The failure of the 1857 upheaval and reign of terror let loose by the British against the Indians could not completely kill their spirit of resistance. As a result, India after 1857 witnessed several anti-British revolts. Some of them were armed.
In Benaras, a mass protest was organised against the imposition of house tax. According to an eye witness account, more than three lakh citizens of Benaras and adjoining areas deserted their houses, shut up their shops and suspended the labour of their farms and sat on dharna in order to force the British to withdraw the house tax order. Similarly, the imposition of income tax in 1860 gave rise to troubles in various parts of Bombay Presidency. These areas included Thana, Kalyan, Bhiwandi, Panvel and Shahpur, Trouble also broke out in Surat in1878 over the imposition of new license tax to meet famine expenditure. The people organized a hartal on 1 April. Four days later, they attacked the railway station in order to seize the stock of grain that was lying there.
In Manipur, Commander-in-Chief Tikendrajit organized a revolt against the British. He did so because they were interfering in the internal affairs of the independent state of Manipur. After a prolonged struggle, Tikendrajit laid down his life. Guru Ram Singh launched Kuka Movement in the Punjab. It was aimed at regaining the lost independence. It was also directed against those who indulged in cow-killing. According to one estimate, Guru Ram Singh had motivated two lakh Sikhs (Namdharis ) to rebel against the British and expel them from the Punjab. In 1872, the British arrested the Guru and lodged him in a prison in Rangoon. In Maharashtra. Vasudeo Balwant Phadke organized a revolutionary society(1879) in order to overthrow British rule. The British captured Phadke and sentenced him to life imprisonment.